Family & Disputes
The Elective Share A Spouse Cannot Be Denied
In many jurisdictions a surviving spouse can reject the will and claim a statutory portion of the estate instead, which limits how far anyone can disinherit a spouse.

A will can generally leave property to anyone. The main exception in many places is the surviving spouse, who may be entitled to claim a fixed portion regardless of what the document says.
The mechanism of election
The surviving spouse chooses between taking what the will provides and taking a statutory share defined by legislation. It is an either-or election, not an addition.
A spouse left a substantial legacy will usually accept the will. The election matters where the spouse was left little or nothing, or given a limited interest rather than outright property.
Making the claim requires a filing within a deadline measured from death or from the opening of probate, and missing it forfeits the right entirely.
What the share is calculated against
The simplest formulations apply a fraction to the probate estate alone, which creates an obvious avoidance route through trusts and beneficiary designations.
Many jurisdictions have responded with an augmented estate concept that pulls back assets transferred into trusts, joint accounts and designations for calculation purposes.
Some schemes scale the fraction with the length of the marriage, so a short marriage yields a smaller entitlement than one lasting decades.
Why the right exists
The historical rationale is that marriage is an economic partnership and a spouse contributes to accumulated wealth whether or not their name is on the assets.
A secondary rationale is public: a disinherited spouse left without support may fall back on public provision, and the estate is expected to bear that responsibility first.
Community property jurisdictions approach the same problem differently, treating marital assets as jointly owned from the outset rather than granting a claim after death.
Where it disrupts a plan
Second marriages generate most elective share disputes, where a plan directing assets to children of a first marriage collides with a later spouse's statutory entitlement.
A trust designed to pay income to the spouse for life and capital to the children can fall short of the statutory measure, prompting an election that dismantles the structure.
The election is exercised after death, so the plan's architect is not present to adjust it, and the children and the spouse are left to litigate the shortfall.
Waiver and negotiated alternatives
Marital agreements before or during marriage can waive the elective share, subject to requirements about disclosure, independent advice and fairness that vary by place.
Alternatively, providing a spouse with assets outside the estate, such as insurance or a designated account, can satisfy them without an election being worth making.
Elective share rules, augmented estate definitions and waiver requirements differ substantially by jurisdiction and change. This is general explanation; any specific plan needs a qualified professional.
Also by Harriet Cole
- Where to start if you have nothing in placeFamily & Disputes
- When someone is left out and finds outFamily & Disputes
- Gifting to reduce a taxable estateEstate Tax
- Financial exploitation of older relativesFamily & Disputes





